Geometry options
Dimension limits
Geometry guidelines
Expert MININEC Broadcast Professional is dimensioned for 10000 current unknowns and 4000 wires. Expert MININEC Classic is dimensioned for 1250 current unknowns and 500 wires. The specific large problem computational capability depends on the internal memory available in the computational platform. For a personnel computer with 8 Mbytes of internal memory, a problem with approximately 700 current unknowns can be accommodated. Problems with 2000 current unknowns have been run successfully on platforms with 20 Mbytes of internal memory. The current computation of Expert MININEC is configured to indicate when a problem is too large for the available memory. However, Windows may not always provide this indication, and the computation will simply stop. If the percentage indicator of the current computation is not progressing after some period of time, the problem is too large for the available memory.
Geometry guidelines permit the user to modify the criteria used in definition evaluation. Method of moments solutions to antenna problems are at best approximations. There are four key factors that determine how close a computer analysis is to the "real world" performance of an antenna. These factors are
numerical methods employed and how well these methods are implemented in a computer code,
inherent accuracy of the computer,
how well the antenna numerical model corresponds to the physical model,
user's experience in recognizing problem areas.
The last factor requires the user to be fully aware of potential difficulties throughout the modeling process, from initial setup to output interpretation. User experience is gained through the process of code validation. The process of code validation is one of verifying the accuracy, and perhaps relevance, for a few well selected configurations or scenarios. This process will lead to "a warm and fuzzy feeling" that the code can provide reliable and accurate predictions. A perception of the expected accuracy within the stated limitations and scope of the program is achieved.
New users should always verify that the code produces modeling results that are self consistent. The user should also try reproducing the results of others, verifying those calculations with available canonical solutions or measurements, as suggested by the documentation and experience reported by others. Satisfactory results always contribute to the user perception of validity and self-confidence in using the code. Training and experience go hand in hand with the successful application of the electromagnetic modeling program. The training may be formal in a course or simply self-taught by extensive reading and trial and error.
A set of modeling guidelines have been developed to aid the user in constructing a numerical model of an antenna. These guidelines are in keeping with the assumptions of the Expert MININEC Series formulation. These are guidelines. For a specific problem the user may be able to obtain useful engineering answers outside these guidelines.
segment length (wavelengths): Each wire should be subdivided into segments comparable to less than 0.1 wavelengths. There is significant loss of accuracy if the segments are greater than 0.2 wavelengths. The segments can be made very small with respect to a wavelength. Good results are obtained to a lowest frequency of 3E-13 MHz. Such small segments do not work as well for loops.
segment length/radius ratio: The shortest permissible segment is usually determined by the wire radius. With the thin wire assumption, the ratio of segment length to wire radius should be maintained greater than 8. Some reasonable results can be obtained down to 2. For thin segments good results have been obtained for ratios of 1E7.
radius (wavelengths): The wires must be "thin" because the current is assumed to flow axially on the wire with no circumferential component. The wires are considered to fully satisfy the guidelines if they are thinner than .01 wavelengths. If wires are fatter than .03 wavelengths, the results may be questionable.
segment length ratio: Conservatively, wires making up a junction should not be too dissimilar in their segment lengths at the junction. For best results the ratio should be less than 2. Differences greater than 5 should be avoided.
radius ratio: For best results the ratio of the radii of wires at a junction should be less than 10. The Expert MININEC Series formulation has shown reasonable results to ratios of 100.
number of wire radii: This defines the distance from the center of the wire in number of radii that is used to determine when wires cross. Crossed wires that touch will not be computed correctly, because the junction is not modeled unless the intercept point is a geometry point. In addition very close wires should be avoided.